April 9, 2026

Quick Lift: Managing Gen Z at Work | 5 Practical Takeaways for Leaders and Parents

The player is loading ...
Quick Lift: Managing Gen Z at Work | 5 Practical Takeaways for Leaders and Parents

Gen Z is getting a lot of attention at work right now — and not always for the right reasons. In this Quick Lift, we break down five of the biggest takeaways from the conversation with Dr. Andrea Mata, including what managers are getting wrong, where parents may be overcorrecting, and what Gen Z can do to stand out in a crowded workplace.

This is not a lazy generational rant. It is a practical recap on expectations, accountability, coaching, and the skills young employees need to succeed.

We cover:

▪ Why labeling Gen Z is lazy leadership

▪ What “high expectations with high support” actually looks like

▪ Why coaching is often smarter than constant turnover

▪ The parenting shift that may be hurting resilience

▪ What Gen Z can do right now to build a stronger reputation at work

Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player icon

WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.060
Welcome to A Loud and Lifted Quick Lift, where

00:00:02.060 --> 00:00:04.160
we take a full episode and boil it down to the

00:00:04.160 --> 00:00:06.839
key takeaways and action steps you can actually

00:00:06.839 --> 00:00:09.660
use. Today, we're breaking down our conversation

00:00:09.660 --> 00:00:13.140
with Dr. Andrea Mata. And this one is for managers,

00:00:13.419 --> 00:00:16.460
leaders, parents of Gen Zs, oh, and Gen Zers

00:00:16.460 --> 00:00:19.460
themselves. Because let's be honest, this topic

00:00:19.460 --> 00:00:22.100
is everywhere right now. People are frustrated

00:00:22.100 --> 00:00:24.859
with Gen Z in the workplace. They're questioning

00:00:24.859 --> 00:00:27.730
their work ethic. the communication, professionalism,

00:00:28.050 --> 00:00:31.390
and resilience. But Andrea brought a much more

00:00:31.390 --> 00:00:34.250
useful perspective to the conversation. Her point

00:00:34.250 --> 00:00:37.530
was not that Gen Z is broken, it's that many

00:00:37.530 --> 00:00:40.750
of them are under equipped. And that shift matters.

00:00:41.189 --> 00:00:43.729
Because if they're under equipped, then the conversation

00:00:43.729 --> 00:00:47.090
is no longer just about blame. It becomes about

00:00:47.090 --> 00:00:50.210
responsibility. What do leaders need to do differently?

00:00:50.530 --> 00:00:52.990
What do parents need to do differently? And what

00:00:52.990 --> 00:00:55.969
does Gen Z need to understand if they want to

00:00:55.969 --> 00:00:58.670
succeed? So for this quick lift, we're pulling

00:00:58.670 --> 00:01:01.189
out five takeaways from the episode, three for

00:01:01.189 --> 00:01:04.109
managers, one for parents, and one for Gen Z.

00:01:04.489 --> 00:01:06.730
And with each one, there is an action item because

00:01:06.730 --> 00:01:09.909
insight without action is just more content.

00:01:10.209 --> 00:01:13.209
Takeaway number one for managers, stop labeling

00:01:13.209 --> 00:01:16.530
Gen Z and start identifying the actual skill

00:01:16.530 --> 00:01:19.659
gap. This was one of the biggest mindset shifts

00:01:19.659 --> 00:01:22.939
in the whole episode. It's really easy to look

00:01:22.939 --> 00:01:25.459
at a younger employee and call them entitled,

00:01:25.819 --> 00:01:28.780
lazy, distracted, soft, or even difficult. And

00:01:28.780 --> 00:01:31.420
sure, sometimes these behaviors are frustrating.

00:01:32.019 --> 00:01:35.260
Andrea did not pretend otherwise. But her point

00:01:35.260 --> 00:01:37.739
was that when leaders stop at the label, they

00:01:37.739 --> 00:01:40.489
miss the real issue. A lot of these employees

00:01:40.489 --> 00:01:43.670
are not impossible. They're underprepared. And

00:01:43.670 --> 00:01:46.450
that is a big difference. Because if someone

00:01:46.450 --> 00:01:48.829
is underprepared, then the question becomes,

00:01:48.930 --> 00:01:51.329
what are they missing? Do they understand what

00:01:51.329 --> 00:01:53.489
professionalism looks like? Do they struggle

00:01:53.489 --> 00:01:56.390
with direct communication? Have they ever been

00:01:56.390 --> 00:01:59.430
taught how to take initiative? Do they know how

00:01:59.430 --> 00:02:01.450
to handle feedback without getting defensive?

00:02:02.250 --> 00:02:05.239
Those are coachable things. And I think this

00:02:05.239 --> 00:02:07.579
matters because too many leaders are personalizing

00:02:07.579 --> 00:02:10.599
behaviors that are often about lack of development.

00:02:11.039 --> 00:02:13.560
This does not mean we excuse poor performance,

00:02:13.599 --> 00:02:16.780
to be clear. It means we lead more effectively.

00:02:17.319 --> 00:02:20.240
If we want better outcomes, we need to get more

00:02:20.240 --> 00:02:23.000
precise. Andrea made the point that with the

00:02:23.000 --> 00:02:25.219
right development, these employees can become

00:02:25.219 --> 00:02:28.780
great employees, but we cannot get there if all

00:02:28.780 --> 00:02:31.560
we do is complain about the generation. Look,

00:02:31.620 --> 00:02:34.250
I know it's hard. The action item here though,

00:02:34.330 --> 00:02:37.069
think about one Gen Z employee who's been frustrating

00:02:37.069 --> 00:02:39.530
you. Write down the labels you've been using

00:02:39.530 --> 00:02:42.330
in your head or out loud. Maybe you've been thinking

00:02:42.330 --> 00:02:45.590
that they're lazy, entitled, immature, unreliable,

00:02:45.590 --> 00:02:49.030
but then rewrite it as a skill gap. For example,

00:02:49.310 --> 00:02:52.330
not lazy, but doesn't take initiative without

00:02:52.330 --> 00:02:56.389
direction. Not immature, but struggles to regulate

00:02:56.389 --> 00:02:59.939
emotions when getting feedback. Or how about

00:02:59.939 --> 00:03:02.639
not unprofessional but doesn't understand workplace

00:03:02.639 --> 00:03:05.919
norms? That one exercise will immediately make

00:03:05.919 --> 00:03:09.560
your response more useful. Takeaway number two

00:03:09.560 --> 00:03:12.000
for managers. You can keep the bar high, but

00:03:12.000 --> 00:03:15.139
you have to make the expectations clear. Andrea

00:03:15.139 --> 00:03:17.860
said it perfectly. High expectations with high

00:03:17.860 --> 00:03:20.500
support. That line is really the heart of the

00:03:20.500 --> 00:03:22.740
episode because I think a lot of leaders are

00:03:22.740 --> 00:03:25.219
stuck in one or two bad approaches on one side.

00:03:25.500 --> 00:03:28.219
They get frustrated and they say, they should

00:03:28.219 --> 00:03:30.419
just know how to do this. This is common sense.

00:03:31.039 --> 00:03:33.280
Or on the other side, they lower the standard

00:03:33.280 --> 00:03:35.180
because they don't want to seem harsh or because

00:03:35.180 --> 00:03:37.259
they assume this generation just needs different

00:03:37.259 --> 00:03:40.479
treatment. Turns out neither one of those options

00:03:40.479 --> 00:03:43.900
work. Andrea's point was not lower the bar. It

00:03:43.900 --> 00:03:47.229
was support more. And where this gets real is

00:03:47.229 --> 00:03:49.830
how vague managers can be. We say things like,

00:03:49.969 --> 00:03:52.069
be professional, take ownership, communicate

00:03:52.069 --> 00:03:54.849
better, have a better attitude. That sounds fine,

00:03:54.849 --> 00:03:56.930
but it's actually not very helpful, especially

00:03:56.930 --> 00:03:59.050
for employees early in their career. If someone

00:03:59.050 --> 00:04:01.770
has never had strong workplace modeling, these

00:04:01.770 --> 00:04:04.270
phrases don't mean much. Clear leadership sounds

00:04:04.270 --> 00:04:07.189
like respond to and message within 24 hours.

00:04:07.569 --> 00:04:09.550
Come to the meeting prepared with updates and

00:04:09.550 --> 00:04:11.430
questions. If you're going to miss a deadline,

00:04:11.590 --> 00:04:14.050
tell me before it becomes a problem. Don't wear

00:04:14.050 --> 00:04:15.879
leggings to work. OK, just threw that one in

00:04:15.879 --> 00:04:18.639
there for fun. But this is what people can actually

00:04:18.639 --> 00:04:21.639
respond to. Andrea also talked about how the

00:04:21.639 --> 00:04:24.019
old style of waiting for annual reviews is not

00:04:24.019 --> 00:04:26.439
effective here. These employees need shorter

00:04:26.439 --> 00:04:29.319
loops, faster feedback, more frequent in -the

00:04:29.319 --> 00:04:31.860
-moment correction. It's real -time coaching.

00:04:32.300 --> 00:04:34.300
And honestly, that's not a bad thing for anyone.

00:04:34.579 --> 00:04:37.199
A lot of us would benefit from that. Action item,

00:04:37.480 --> 00:04:40.019
pick one expectation you have that is currently

00:04:40.019 --> 00:04:42.699
too vague and rewrite it into three specific

00:04:42.699 --> 00:04:46.180
behaviors. Then communicate that clearly to the

00:04:46.180 --> 00:04:48.379
employee this week. If people are missing the

00:04:48.379 --> 00:04:50.620
mark, ask yourself, did I actually define the

00:04:50.620 --> 00:04:54.129
mark very, very clearly? Takeaway number three

00:04:54.129 --> 00:04:55.949
for managers. If you're burning through your

00:04:55.949 --> 00:04:58.350
talent, this is not just their problem. It may

00:04:58.350 --> 00:05:01.310
be your leadership system. This was another strong

00:05:01.310 --> 00:05:03.790
point Andrea made. And I love she grounded it

00:05:03.790 --> 00:05:06.209
in business reality. There is a lot of noise

00:05:06.209 --> 00:05:08.230
right now about Gen Z getting fired quickly.

00:05:08.410 --> 00:05:11.949
But her point was that constant turnover is expensive.

00:05:12.629 --> 00:05:14.870
Rehiring is expensive. Retraining is expensive.

00:05:15.009 --> 00:05:18.089
Losing momentum, expensive. Oh, and frustrating

00:05:18.089 --> 00:05:21.550
your team. Also expensive. So before leaders

00:05:21.550 --> 00:05:23.689
get smug about, we'll just get rid of them. The

00:05:23.689 --> 00:05:26.250
better question is, what are we actually solving?

00:05:26.730 --> 00:05:29.290
Now, to be clear, not every employee should be

00:05:29.290 --> 00:05:32.350
coached and kept forever. Some people just aren't

00:05:32.350 --> 00:05:34.250
a fit. They don't want to improve or they're

00:05:34.250 --> 00:05:36.970
just simply not going to make it. But I think

00:05:36.970 --> 00:05:40.149
Andrea's challenge was fair. A lot of organizations

00:05:40.149 --> 00:05:42.329
are not even really trying to develop people

00:05:42.329 --> 00:05:45.610
before moving on. And if the same issues keep

00:05:45.610 --> 00:05:48.769
showing up with hire after hire, then it may

00:05:48.769 --> 00:05:50.949
be more than just a hiring issue alone. There

00:05:50.949 --> 00:05:53.449
may be a management issue or an onboarding issue

00:05:53.449 --> 00:05:56.589
or even clarity. She made the case that coaching

00:05:56.589 --> 00:05:58.970
is often a much better investment than just writing

00:05:58.970 --> 00:06:01.639
people off. If you can help someone understand

00:06:01.639 --> 00:06:04.399
expectations, adapt their behavior, and strengthen

00:06:04.399 --> 00:06:07.259
self -awareness, you may save yourself a lot

00:06:07.259 --> 00:06:10.399
of pain and cost in the long run. This requires

00:06:10.399 --> 00:06:12.800
more maturity from leaders, it's easier to complain,

00:06:12.959 --> 00:06:15.259
it's harder to coach, but coaching is usually

00:06:15.259 --> 00:06:18.579
where the real payoff is. Action item, take one

00:06:18.579 --> 00:06:21.079
struggling employee and do a quick reset before

00:06:21.079 --> 00:06:23.879
you write them off. Ask, have we onboarded them

00:06:23.879 --> 00:06:26.399
well? Have we clearly explained expectations?

00:06:26.680 --> 00:06:29.160
Have we've given specific feedback? Have we told

00:06:29.160 --> 00:06:31.920
them what better actually looks like? And then

00:06:31.920 --> 00:06:34.459
have we followed up? If the answer is no to most

00:06:34.459 --> 00:06:36.600
of that, you likely need a coaching conversation

00:06:36.600 --> 00:06:39.360
before a replacement plan. And as Andrea said,

00:06:39.439 --> 00:06:42.639
you may need outside help. So seek that if so.

00:06:42.899 --> 00:06:45.300
There's people who are very experienced in this.

00:06:45.519 --> 00:06:48.620
Our next takeaway is for the parents. Support

00:06:48.620 --> 00:06:51.300
without standards is setting kids up for a rough

00:06:51.300 --> 00:06:53.680
landing. This part of the conversation was so

00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:56.259
interesting and of course hit home for me because

00:06:56.259 --> 00:06:59.139
it pulled the workplace issue back to the home.

00:06:59.899 --> 00:07:01.579
Andrea talked about how a lot of parents today

00:07:01.579 --> 00:07:04.240
were raised in environments that felt much harsher.

00:07:04.439 --> 00:07:07.560
You know, the Gen X parents, very rigid, very

00:07:07.560 --> 00:07:11.490
authoritative. more shame, more fear, less emotional

00:07:11.490 --> 00:07:14.870
connection. So naturally, many parents overcorrected.

00:07:15.110 --> 00:07:17.529
They wanted to be more emotionally aware, more

00:07:17.529 --> 00:07:20.170
validating, and more supportive. And that part's

00:07:20.170 --> 00:07:23.449
good. But the problem is where support becomes

00:07:23.449 --> 00:07:27.050
softness without structure. This is where Andrea

00:07:27.050 --> 00:07:29.430
brought up authoritative parenting. And honestly,

00:07:29.569 --> 00:07:31.790
it was such an important distinction. She basically

00:07:31.790 --> 00:07:34.509
said, yes, be warm. Yes, validate their feelings.

00:07:34.769 --> 00:07:37.339
Yes, have a connection. But there still needs

00:07:37.339 --> 00:07:40.819
to be expectations. There still needs to be consequences,

00:07:41.240 --> 00:07:43.660
and there needs to be responsibility. Because

00:07:43.660 --> 00:07:47.199
eventually kids become employees. And if they've

00:07:47.199 --> 00:07:50.240
never had to do hard things, tolerate discomfort,

00:07:50.560 --> 00:07:52.899
hear no, take feedback, or live with consequences,

00:07:53.160 --> 00:07:56.199
then the workplace feels brutal. This does not

00:07:56.199 --> 00:07:58.800
mean parents are to blame for everything. Of

00:07:58.800 --> 00:08:01.920
course not, I guess. But it does mean that habits

00:08:01.920 --> 00:08:05.300
we build at home matter. Accountability starts

00:08:05.300 --> 00:08:08.060
long before someone gets their first boss. I

00:08:08.060 --> 00:08:09.620
feel like this takeaway is especially relevant

00:08:09.620 --> 00:08:11.420
because so many parents want to protect their

00:08:11.420 --> 00:08:14.639
kids from struggle. I get it. But overprotecting

00:08:14.639 --> 00:08:17.579
can quietly undermine confidence and capability.

00:08:18.220 --> 00:08:20.680
If a younger person has never had to recover,

00:08:20.839 --> 00:08:23.339
push through or own something, they do not build

00:08:23.339 --> 00:08:26.439
resilience. And resilience is a big part of what

00:08:26.439 --> 00:08:29.459
this conversation is really about. Action item

00:08:29.459 --> 00:08:31.980
for the parents. Pick one area at home where

00:08:31.980 --> 00:08:34.179
you may have been too loose because you felt

00:08:34.179 --> 00:08:36.659
it was easier in the moment. Maybe it's chores,

00:08:37.080 --> 00:08:39.519
curfew, attitude, screen time, follow through,

00:08:39.679 --> 00:08:43.179
or just basic responsibility. Reset it with warmth

00:08:43.179 --> 00:08:47.559
and clarity. Not harshly, not dramatically, just

00:08:47.559 --> 00:08:50.779
clearly. This is the expectation. This is the

00:08:50.779 --> 00:08:53.379
consequence. And this is because we're raising

00:08:53.379 --> 00:08:56.509
an adult, not managing a mood. And the last takeaway

00:08:56.509 --> 00:09:00.090
is for Gen Z. The opportunity is huge right now

00:09:00.090 --> 00:09:02.570
because doing the basics well will make you stand

00:09:02.570 --> 00:09:05.730
out fast. Andrea had some lines in the episode

00:09:05.730 --> 00:09:08.149
that were funny, but they're also true. The first

00:09:08.149 --> 00:09:11.370
one, show up to work, not high. And listen, that

00:09:11.370 --> 00:09:13.549
line gets a laugh, but her point is serious.

00:09:13.730 --> 00:09:16.049
The bar is low right now in some workplaces,

00:09:16.149 --> 00:09:19.149
like really low, which means if you do the basics

00:09:19.149 --> 00:09:22.129
well, you can separate yourself quickly. Show

00:09:22.129 --> 00:09:26.110
up on time. Be present. care, be coachable, take

00:09:26.110 --> 00:09:29.049
feedback without spiraling, ask questions, follow

00:09:29.049 --> 00:09:32.309
through and have some general awareness. These

00:09:32.309 --> 00:09:34.450
things are not glamorous, but they build trust

00:09:34.450 --> 00:09:36.870
fast. And then she had another line I loved,

00:09:37.110 --> 00:09:39.409
pick up the trash. This is one of my favorite

00:09:39.409 --> 00:09:41.850
because it says so much in such a simple way.

00:09:42.389 --> 00:09:45.250
Notice what needs to be done. Do not wait to

00:09:45.250 --> 00:09:48.090
be managed and told what to do every second.

00:09:48.210 --> 00:09:50.970
Take initiative, have pride, care about the space,

00:09:51.029 --> 00:09:54.210
the team, the work, the details. Be the kind

00:09:54.210 --> 00:09:56.789
of person who makes things better without needing

00:09:56.789 --> 00:10:00.529
an applause or being told what to do every time.

00:10:00.830 --> 00:10:03.350
That mentality matters. Gen Z has a branding

00:10:03.350 --> 00:10:05.590
problem right now, whether that feels fair or

00:10:05.590 --> 00:10:08.490
not. There is a stereotype. Andrea was very real

00:10:08.490 --> 00:10:11.450
about that. So the opportunity for a young employee

00:10:11.450 --> 00:10:14.049
to become the exception people remember, the

00:10:14.049 --> 00:10:16.309
reliable one, the mature one, the one who wants

00:10:16.309 --> 00:10:19.370
feedback and who's self -aware, that stuff can

00:10:19.370 --> 00:10:22.759
add up very quickly. Okay, action item Gen Z.

00:10:22.980 --> 00:10:25.460
For the next five work days, ask yourself the

00:10:25.460 --> 00:10:27.879
question at the beginning of every day. What

00:10:27.879 --> 00:10:30.200
would the most dependable person here do today?

00:10:30.440 --> 00:10:32.840
Then go do that. It's not the most impressive,

00:10:33.179 --> 00:10:35.980
coolest, smartest, it's just being dependable,

00:10:36.240 --> 00:10:39.200
and that will take you far. Andre's episode was

00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:42.000
fun, authentic, and refreshingly direct, but

00:10:42.000 --> 00:10:44.580
underneath all of it was a real important point.

00:10:44.759 --> 00:10:47.259
This does not get better by blaming a generation.

00:10:47.500 --> 00:10:50.100
It gets better when managers lead better, parents

00:10:50.100 --> 00:10:52.860
parent better, and young employees decide to

00:10:52.860 --> 00:10:56.519
rise above a pretty low bar. If you haven't listened

00:10:56.519 --> 00:10:58.440
to the full episode yet, please go back and do

00:10:58.440 --> 00:11:01.240
that and send it to a manager, a parent, or honestly

00:11:01.240 --> 00:11:03.940
a 20 -something who needs to hear it. Thanks

00:11:03.940 --> 00:11:06.600
for tuning in. Until next time, stay loud and

00:11:06.600 --> 00:11:07.179
stay lifted.

Andrea Mata Profile Photo

Clinical Psychologist